Publications

STJ determines that ICMS is not part of the CPRB calculation basis

May 16, 2019

By Marcelo Blecher

In a trial concluded on April 10, the 1st Section of the Superior Court of Justice (“STJ”) adopted the understanding that ICMS should not be included in the calculation basis of the Social Security Contribution on Gross Revenue (“CPRB”). The decision was handed down in a joint trial of 3 (three) special appeals.[1], judged under the system of repetitive appeals and will be binding on other Courts.

The three appeals challenged decisions by Regional Courts that were favorable to taxpayers. In them, the Treasury alleged that the discussion involved a different issue from the inclusion of ICMS in the PIS and COFINS calculation basis, since the case under analysis by the STJ involved a discussion related to “tax benefits.”

However, according to the vote of the Rapporteur, Min. Regina Helena Costa, the STF, when judging, under the general repercussion system, RE 574.706/PR recognized the unconstitutionality of the inclusion of the state tax in the calculation bases of PIS and COFINS, having even expanded this position to the demands involving the inclusion of said tax in the calculation base of CPRB.

Finally, it is important to highlight that the collegiate unanimously cancelled the Summary Rulings/STJ nºs 68 and 94. The first stated that the portion related to ICMS should be considered for the purposes of inclusion in the PIS calculation basis, and the other that ICMS should be included in the Finsocial calculation basis.

The Mazzucco & Mello Advogados tax team is available to provide any clarification on this topic.

[1] REsp 1,624,297/RS, REsp 1,629,001/SC and REsp 1,638,772/SC

If you have any questions about the topics covered in this publication, please contact any of the lawyers listed below or your usual Mazzucco&Mello contact.

This communication, which we believe may be of interest to our customers and friends of the company, is intended for general information only. It is not a complete analysis of the matters presented and should not be considered legal advice. In some jurisdictions, this may be considered lawyer advertising. Please see the company's privacy notice for more details.

Related Areas

Related Professionals